Inhalt
Financial Market Stabilisation Fund (SoFFin)
SoFFin’s purpose is to stabilise the financial system in Germany. Its goal is and remains the
restoration of mutual confidence among banks and the confidence of society at large and business in
the financial sector. SoFFin funds have stood ready not only for directly rescuing financial
institutions but also for long-term stabilisation by increasing institutions’ resilience.
Institutions have been restructured and their business models redefined and reoriented. At the end
of 2010, SoFFin discontinued the granting of new benefits to credit institutions. However, it
continues to assume responsibilities and control the measures’ conditionality with regard to
existing stabilisation measures. In addition, the funding of existing resolution agencies can be
replenished.
SoFFin had the following instruments at its disposal.
Guarantees
The granting of guarantees by SoFFin was restricted to debt issued by 31 December 2010. This
instrument envisaged SoFFin giving guarantees for newly issued debt securities and justified other
debt issued by financial institutions. The maturity of the guaranteed debt was always between 36
and 60 months. For granting guarantees, the Restructuring Fund charges an individual percentage of
the maximum amount guaranteed, which represents the default risk. This fee is between 0.5% and 2%
p.a..
In order to receive a guarantee, the beneficiary financial corporation must have an adequate
capital base. The upper limit for guarantees was based on the capital of the enterprise (including
all affiliates).
Recapitalisation
SoFFin was able to grant recapitalisation up until 31 December 2010. The aim of
recapitalisation was to give banks the necessary capital.
The Fund obtains remuneration at market prices for deposited capital. For assets contributed
by silent partners, the remuneration is generally between 9% and 10% p.a..
SoFFin was able to recapitalise by purchasing a bank’s new shares or acquiring silent
participations.
Beyond 2010, SoFFin has been authorised to maintain its previously acquired capital
participations, sell them and, if necessary, augment them in order to protect them against
dilution. Purchased shares, silent participations and other rights are to be sold in such a manner
as to disrupt market prices as little as possible.
Resolution agencies
Up until 31 December 2010, banks were able to establish their own resolution agencies under
the aegis of the Federal Agency for Financial Market Stabilisation (FMSA).
Banks were able to transfer to resolution agencies not only structured securities but other
risk exposures – such as non-performing loans – and whole business lines the banks no longer viewed
as strategic. This gave banks the opportunity to wind up these portfolios in an orderly fashion and
to themselves reorient their strategy for a promising future. By transferring risk, the bank
obtained instant relief from capital requirements and write-down pressure caused by value
fluctuations. The resolution bank model implies that the bank’s owners remain economically
responsible for the resolution agency, i.e. they are required to offset any losses made by the
resolution agency.
The FMSA founded two resolution agencies: the Erste Abwicklungsanstalt, to which WestLB
transferred non-strategic business lines and risks, and FMS Wertmanagement, which is where the HRE
Group’s risk exposures and non-strategic assets went. Both resolution agencies were established
under the aegis of, and are subject to legal supervision by, the FMSA. The conditions for the FMSA’s
obligation to settle losses are governed by the resolution agencies’ respective statutes. Once
winding-up is complete, i.e. all transferred risks and business lines have been sold off, the FMSA
will dissolve the resolution agencies.